I reposted this from Huffpost on Facebook yesterday, but I’m not done ranting about it yet.
If you don’t feel like reading it, the short version is this: John Kyl (R-AZ), along with much of the Republican leadership in Congress, is angry that Democrats aren’t rushing to extend the Bush administration tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, cuts which are set to expire soon. At the same time, acting (and I can’t overemphasize how much of a smokescreen this is) like the deficit is the worst thing since, well worse than anything that’s ever happened in human history, those same Congressional Republicans refuse to extend unemployment benefits because doing so would add to the deficit.
It’s hard to begin answering this position because it doesn’t even rise to the level of nonsense. Well, OK, it does, but only given a very specific worldview. In that worldview, what wealthy people want is all that matters. Even if they’re endangering their own wealth, maybe even their own lives, it doesn’t matter. If rich people want lower taxes, they get lower taxes. If they don’t care how many working class people are losing their homes, going hungry, dying because they can’t get medical care (other than visiting the emergency room, which often occurs too late to help them), sending their kids to crumbling schools, and so on, nobody is going to fight them.
I don’t get it. As I said on Facebook when I posted this link yesterday, why are we giving tax breaks to people who need them least while withholding unemployment benefits from the people who need them most?
Yes, I know the conservative answers to that question.
The wealthy need tax breaks because tax breaks lead to job creation. Except that the Bush tax breaks have been in place for 5+ years now, and employment levels have plummeted. I can hear my Republican friends howling about how much that’s the fault of the Clinton administration (he hasn’t been President for 10 years now, y’all). And because in the entire history of capitalism, there still isn’t one scintilla of evidence that “trickle down” has EVER worked.
Unemployment benefits discourage people from looking for work. I’m a pacifist, but I really want to punch people who say this. Only someone who never has to worry about their livelihood could believe it. Much like the “welfare queen” trope of the Reagan era, Republicans have found a way to frame this issue, based on a handful of anecdotes, in order to make anybody who struggles to stay alive look pathological. Lovely.
Unemployment benefits are too expensive. Bullshit. The extension current proposed in Congress would cost about $30 billion. Not only is that a tiny fraction of the overall budget, but what do they think is going to happen with that money? Do they not understand that just about every penny of it will get spent? That is, reinjected right back into the economy, often right into the pockets of their owner class friends? Whatever it gets spent on, it’s getting spent! I don’t think too many unemployed folks are taking their $300/mo. benefit checks and stashing them in IRAs, right?
On the blog GinandTacos, the writer, Ed, says quite bluntly, and I agree, that conservatives who take this stance do so because, one, they hate poor people, and, two, the owner class benefits from a worker pool that’s desperate. I couldn’t agree more.
Why it is that voters don’t show these monsters the same contempt they show voters is beyond me. If I could figure it out, I’d be rich and fam… oh, wait…